Week #4: My Research Proposal

 
Napoleon Bonaparte is one of the very-well known leaders in the history, who was actively involved in the French Revolution. He had an exceptional ability to lead people which enabled him to become an emperor of France at the age of 34. This paper will be about the details of his leadership and how it led to the success of his battles, because so many civilians of France at that time were fascinated by his power, and even today, he is famous for his achievement and contribution for his country. Though Napoleon is also known for his tyrannical side and he lost his position eventually, he was very good at motivating his subordinates and the public and gaining the trust from them, and he was always in the front line of the battle. Ralph Jean-Paul analyzes what we can learn from Napoleon’s leadership, that is written both in a good and a bad way (2011). Morgan T. Deane writes Napoleon’s leadership skills and details of his tactics (1995). Max Sewell focuses on Napoleon’s personality that made him a great leader (1995). These sources seem to support my thesis statement.

So this is my research proposal. Though Napoleon is mainly known for his exceptional ability, he also had some bad sides. For example, he became less confident after being defeated in one of the battles, and also he restricted medias strictly to avoid majorities opposing to him.
Should I also write about his bad sides, too? If so, how should my thesis statement (Though Napoleon is also known for his tyrannical side and he lost his position eventually, he was very good at motivating his subordinates and the public and gaining the trust from them, and he was always in the front line of the battle.)be changed? 
I am looking forward to seeing some comments that can help me><